Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs PRO A8-9600B

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs PRO A8-9600B Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Quad Q9505

4 / 4

2,176

0.0%

2,195

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs PRO A8-9600B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs PRO A8-9600B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q9505

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,176 vs 2,195).
❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while PRO A8-9600B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.

PRO A8-9600B

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A8-9600B better than Core 2 Quad Q9505?

Yes. PRO A8-9600B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A8-9600B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A8-9600B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A8-9600B is still the much better call for a fresh build. PRO A8-9600B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Quad Q9505 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A8-9600B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs PRO A8-9600B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q9505

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.

PRO A8-9600B

The PRO A8-9600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,195 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Quad Q9505 and PRO A8-9600B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus 3.3 GHz on the PRO A8-9600B — a 119.6% clock advantage for the PRO A8-9600B (base: 2.83 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the PRO A8-9600B uses Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9505 scores 2,176 against the PRO A8-9600B's 2,195 — a 0.9% lead for the PRO A8-9600B.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q9505	PRO A8-9600B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	0.83 GHz	3.3 GHz+298%
Base Clock	2.83 GHz+18%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache	—
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)+200%	2048 kB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
PassMark	2,176	2,195

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the PRO A8-9600B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.