Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Pro A10-8700B

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Pro A10-8700B Performance Spectrum

Core 2 Quad Q9505

4 / 4

2,176

+0.3%

2,170

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Pro A10-8700B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Pro A10-8700B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q9505

2009

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $213 MSRP, while Pro A10-8700B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.

Pro A10-8700B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,170 vs 2,176).

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A10-8700B better than Core 2 Quad Q9505?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pro A10-8700B is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q9505 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q9505 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A10-8700B is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pro A10-8700B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $213 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Quad Q9505 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2009 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A10-8700B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Pro A10-8700B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Quad Q9505

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.

Pro A10-8700B

The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Pro A10-8700B share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B — a 117.6% clock advantage for the Pro A10-8700B (base: 2.83 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Pro A10-8700B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9505 scores 2,176 against the Pro A10-8700B's 2,170 — a 0.3% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q9505.

Feature	Core 2 Quad Q9505	Pro A10-8700B
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	0.83 GHz	3.2 GHz+286%
Base Clock	2.83 GHz+57%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	6 MB L2 Cache	—
L2 Cache	6 MB (total)+200%	2048 kB
Process	45 nm	28 nm-38%
Architecture	Yorkfield (2007−2009)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	2,176	2,170

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pro A10-8700B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.