Core 2 Quad Q9505
VS
Core m3-6Y30

Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs Core m3-6Y30

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9505

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 0.83 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core m3-6Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is positioned at rank 993 and the Core m3-6Y30 is on rank 1136, so the Core 2 Quad Q9505 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Quad Q9505

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
30500%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
28820%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
20926%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
6304%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4993%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4368%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2502%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2469%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2248%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2248%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2223%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2163%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2133%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2124%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2105%
#304
Core i7-6950X
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $180
100%
#993
Core 2 Quad Q9505
MSRP: $213|Avg: $150
100%
#996
Core i7-930
MSRP: $294|Avg: $20
100%
#997
Core i7-920
MSRP: $284|Avg: $79
99%
#998
Core i7-4960X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $136
98%
#999
Pentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
96%
#1001
Core 2 Duo E4400
MSRP: $113|Avg: $20
95%
#1002
Pentium D 915
MSRP: $74|Avg: $10
93%
#1003
Core 2 Quad Q9400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
92%
#1004
Core i5-655K
MSRP: $216|Avg: $55
91%
#1005
Celeron 450
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
91%
#1006
Core 2 Duo E4600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $9.6
91%
#1008
Core i7-870S
MSRP: $300|Avg: $80
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-6Y30

#1124
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3781%
#1125
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3726%
#1126
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3420%
#1127
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3405%
#1128
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3373%
#1130
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3258%
#1131
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3124%
#1132
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3119%
#1133
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3035%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
99%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
98%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
97%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
96%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core m3-6Y30 (2015) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore 2 Quad Q9505Core m3-6Y30
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Yorkfield (2007−2009) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore 2 Quad Q9505Core m3-6Y30
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+87%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($150)
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Quad Q9505 and Core m3-6Y30

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q9505

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 0.83 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core m3-6Y30

The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core m3-6Y30 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q9505 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 0.83 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 versus 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 — a 90.4% clock advantage for the Core m3-6Y30 (base: 2.83 GHz vs 0.9 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the Yorkfield (2007−2009) architecture (45 nm), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses Skylake-Y (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q9505 scores 2,176 against the Core m3-6Y30's 2,180 — a 0.2% lead for the Core m3-6Y30. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Quad Q9505 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9505Core m3-6Y30
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
0.83 GHz
2.2 GHz+165%
Base Clock
2.83 GHz+214%
0.9 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
6 MB (total)+2300%
256 kB (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Yorkfield (2007−2009)
Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark
2,176
2,180
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core m3-6Y30 uses FCBGA1515 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9505Core m3-6Y30
Socket
LGA775
FCBGA1515
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 3.0+173%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q9505) / not specified (Core m3-6Y30). Primary use case: Core 2 Quad Q9505 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9505Core m3-6Y30
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core 2 Quad Q9505 launched at $213 MSRP, while the Core m3-6Y30 debuted at $281. At current prices ($150 vs $281), the Core 2 Quad Q9505 is $131 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q9505 delivers 14.5 pts/$ vs 7.8 pts/$ for the Core m3-6Y30 — making the Core 2 Quad Q9505 the 60.6% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q9505Core m3-6Y30
MSRP
$213-24%
$281
Avg Price (30d)
$150-47%
$281
Performance per Dollar
14.5+86%
7.8
Release Date
2009
2015