Phenom X4 9850B
VS
Core i3-3220T

Phenom X4 9850B vs Core i3-3220T

AMD

Phenom X4 9850B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core i3-3220T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9850B is positioned at rank 331 and the Core i3-3220T is on rank 939, so the Phenom X4 9850B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9850B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
4805%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4540%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3297%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
993%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
787%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
688%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
394%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
389%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
354%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
354%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
350%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
341%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
336%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
335%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
332%
#298
Core i5-9500F
MSRP: $187|Avg: $154
100%
#299
Core i9-11900KB
MSRP: $539|Avg: $350
100%
#300
Core i7-10700F
MSRP: $310|Avg: $250
100%
#301
Core i7-10700T
MSRP: $355|Avg: $200
99%
#302
Celeron G5920
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
99%
#303
Core i3-10105T
MSRP: $122|Avg: $122
99%
#304
Celeron G5900
MSRP: $50|Avg: $42
98%
#305
Core 5 120
MSRP: $340|Avg: $340
98%
#306
Core i7-12700T
MSRP: $339|Avg: $337
97%
#307
Core 3 100HL
MSRP: $306|Avg: $280
97%
#308
Core i9-11900F
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $358.87
95%
#331
Phenom X4 9850B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#344
Athlon X4 950
MSRP: $58|Avg: $15
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3220T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
23777%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
22467%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
16313%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4914%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3893%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3405%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1950%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1925%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1753%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1753%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1733%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1686%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1663%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1656%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1641%
#939
Core i3-3220T
MSRP: $149|Avg: $146
100%
#940
Athlon II X2 245e
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
100%
#941
Athlon II X2 240e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $77
100%
#942
Pentium G630T
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
100%
#943
Core i7-3970X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $175
99%
#946
Core i5-650
MSRP: $176|Avg: $22
98%
#947
A10-6790B
MSRP: $122|Avg: $50
97%
#948
Phenom X3 8600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
97%
#949
Core i3-6100TE
MSRP: $250|Avg: $90
96%
#950
FX-4320
MSRP: $250|Avg: $100
96%
#951
Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition
MSRP: $990|Avg: $150
96%
#952
Celeron E1200
MSRP: $53|Avg: $98
96%
#954
Core i5-660
MSRP: $196|Avg: $150
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-3220T delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Phenom X4 9850B in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPhenom X4 9850BCore i3-3220T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($146)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom X4 9850BCore i3-3220T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($146)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9850B and Core i3-3220T

AMD

Phenom X4 9850B

The Phenom X4 9850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,946 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i3-3220T

The Core i3-3220T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,953 points. Launch price was $201.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9850B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-3220T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom X4 9850B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Phenom X4 9850B versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-3220T — a 11.3% clock advantage for the Core i3-3220T. The Phenom X4 9850B uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-3220T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9850B scores 1,946 against the Core i3-3220T's 1,953 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-3220T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9850B vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-3220T.

FeaturePhenom X4 9850BCore i3-3220T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
22 nm-66%
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,946
1,953
Geekbench 6 Single
465
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9850B uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3220T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X4 9850BCore i3-3220T
Socket
AM2+
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X4 9850B) / VT-x, EPT (Core i3-3220T). The Core i3-3220T includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 2500), while the Phenom X4 9850B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-3220T targets Low Power Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-3220T rivals A8-5500.

FeaturePhenom X4 9850BCore i3-3220T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Low Power Desktop