
PRO A10-8850B vs Atom C3708

PRO A10-8850B

Atom C3708
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The PRO A10-8850B is positioned at rank 281 and the Atom C3708 is on rank 615, so the PRO A10-8850B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar PRO A10-8850B
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3708
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | PRO A10-8850B | Atom C3708 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | PRO A10-8850B | Atom C3708 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of PRO A10-8850B and Atom C3708

PRO A10-8850B
The PRO A10-8850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,752 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom C3708
The Atom C3708 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,750 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
The PRO A10-8850B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom C3708 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Atom C3708 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the PRO A10-8850B versus 1.7 GHz on the Atom C3708 — a 82.8% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8850B (base: 3.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The PRO A10-8850B uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom C3708 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A10-8850B scores 3,752 against the Atom C3708's 3,750 — a 0.1% lead for the PRO A10-8850B.
| Feature | PRO A10-8850B | Atom C3708 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 8+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz+141% | 1.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.9 GHz+129% | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB | 16 MB+300% |
| Process | 28 nm | 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 3,752 | 3,750 |
Memory & Platform
The PRO A10-8850B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom C3708 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | PRO A10-8850B | Atom C3708 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















