
RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Popular choices:

GeForce FX 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 425% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5200.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+425%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-425%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $30 (vs $25), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 337.5% better value per dollar than the GeForce FX 5200.
| Insight | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+337.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($25) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 and GeForce FX 5200

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.

GeForce FX 5200
The GeForce FX 5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 30 2025. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 2017 MHz to 2407 MHz. It has 21760 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 575W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 170 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 scores 42 versus the GeForce FX 5200's 8 — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leads by 425%. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is built on RDNA 4.0 while the GeForce FX 5200 uses Rankine, both on 4 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 21,760 (GeForce FX 5200). Raw compute: 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 104.8 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200). Boost clocks: 2920 MHz vs 2407 MHz. Ray tracing: 64 RT cores (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 170 (GeForce FX 5200) with 128 Tensor cores vs 680.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 42+425% | 8 |
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 21760+431% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 47.84 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS+119% |
| Boost Clock | 2920 MHz+21% | 2407 MHz |
| ROPs | 128 | 176+38% |
| TMUs | 256 | 680+166% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 96 MB+1100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 64 | 170+166% |
| Tensor Cores | 128 | 680+431% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5200 has 128 MB. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 96 MB (GeForce FX 5200) — the GeForce FX 5200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 96 MB+1100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.0 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0 | 9.0a |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 2.0+33% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs None (GeForce FX 5200). Decoder: VideoShader vs MPEG-2 Motion Compensation. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5200).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | None |
| Decoder | VideoShader | MPEG-2 Motion Compensation |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 draws 300W versus the GeForce FX 5200's 575W — a 62.9% difference. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 175mm vs 152mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W-48% | 575W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 175mm | 152mm |
| Height | 100mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the GeForce FX 5200 launched at $70 and now averages $25. The GeForce FX 5200 costs 16.7% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) vs 0.3 (GeForce FX 5200) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 366.7% better value.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 | GeForce FX 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $70 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $25-17% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.4+367% | 0.3 |
| Codename | Navi 48 | GB202 |
| Release | July 23 2025 | January 30 2025 |
| Ranking | #23 | #3 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















