
Processor N250

Ryzen 7 3700X
Processor N250 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Processor N250 vs Ryzen 7 3700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Processor N250 vs Ryzen 7 3700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Processor N250
2025Why buy it
- β Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (2,786 vs 22,430).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +302.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +433.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 6 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Processor N250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- β983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Processor N250 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Processor N250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Processor N250 vs Ryzen 7 3700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Processor N250
The Processor N250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024β2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,786 points. Launch price was $69.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.
Processing Power
The Processor N250 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads β the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Processor N250 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X β a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 0.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Processor N250 uses the Twin Lake (2024β2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Processor N250 scores 2,786 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 β a 155.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Processor N250 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.
| Feature | Processor N250 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz | 4.4 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3500% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 32 MB+433% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 512K (per core)+25500% |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Twin Lake (2024β2025) | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 2,786 | 22,430+705% |
Memory & Platform
The Processor N250 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Processor N250 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 24 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Processor N250 was priced at $0, while the Ryzen 7 3700X came in at $329. On launch pricing ($0 vs $329), Processor N250 was $329 cheaper.
| Feature | Processor N250 | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | β | 68.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














