
Core i5-4200M

Processor N250
Core i5-4200M vs Processor N250 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-4200M vs Processor N250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-4200M vs Processor N250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-4200M
2013Why buy it
- ✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Processor N250 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Processor N250 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌8433.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 6W.
- ❌Older platform position on PGA946, while Processor N250 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Processor N250
2025Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 3 MB).
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 512W, a 506W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of PGA946 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (2,786 vs 2,809).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Processor N250 better than Core i5-4200M?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-4200M vs Processor N250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200M
The Core i5-4200M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 37 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,809 points. Launch price was $225.

Processor N250
The Processor N250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,786 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4200M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Processor N250 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Processor N250 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-4200M versus 3.8 GHz on the Processor N250 — a 20.3% clock advantage for the Processor N250 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i5-4200M uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Processor N250 uses Twin Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200M scores 2,809 against the Processor N250's 2,786 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-4200M. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4200M vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N250.
| Feature | Core i5-4200M | Processor N250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.8 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+2400% | 0.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 2 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 22 nm | 10 nm-55% |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Twin Lake (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,809 | 2,786 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4200M uses the PGA946 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N250 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-4200M | Processor N250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA946 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4200M) / not specified (Processor N250). The Core i5-4200M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Processor N250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200M targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-4200M | Processor N250 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics 4600 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-4200M was priced at $225, while the Processor N250 came in at $0. On launch pricing ($225 vs $0), Processor N250 was $225 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-4200M | Processor N250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $225 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | — |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














