CPU
GPU
Quadro 1000M
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro 1000M is positioned at rank 199 and the FirePro 3D V5700 is on rank 355, so the Quadro 1000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 1000M
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 1000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro 3D V5700.
| Insight | Quadro 1000M | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 1000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 1000M and FirePro 3D V5700
Quadro 1000M
The Quadro 1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 555 points. Launch price was $200.89.
FirePro 3D V5700
The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro 1000M scores 555 and the FirePro 3D V5700 reaches 547 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 1000M is built on Maxwell while the FirePro 3D V5700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 1000M) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V5700). Raw compute: 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro 1000M) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V5700).
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 555+1% | 547 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.017 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+242% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro 1000M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V5700 has 512 MB. The Quadro 1000M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro 1000M) vs 0.75 MB (FirePro 3D V5700) — the Quadro 1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro 1000M draws 40W versus the FirePro 3D V5700's 274W — a 149% difference. The Quadro 1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 1000M) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-85% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.9+595% | 2.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 1000M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro 1000M | FirePro 3D V5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $25 |
| Codename | GM107 | Tahiti |
| Release | August 18 2015 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #594 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro 1000M and FirePro 3D V5700
