Quadro 7000 vs GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro 7000

2012Core: 651 MHz

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro 7000

204

3,505

0.0%

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3060 12GB

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

GeForce GTX 1650

7,869

+124.5%

GeForce GTX 880M SLI

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 960

GeForce GTX 1650 (móvel)

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

GeForce GTX 1080

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro 7000 is positioned at rank #398 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro 7000

#382

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

61554%

#397

Quadro FX 1500

MSRP: $699|Avg: $30

100%

#398

Quadro 7000

MSRP: $14499|Avg: $300

100%

#399

Tesla M2070-Q

MSRP: $5489|Avg: $50

100%

#400

Quadro FX 3700

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $500

96%

#401

Quadro FX 4700 X2

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $15

96%

#402

GRID M10-0B

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000

92%

#403

GRID K340

MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57

83%

#405

Quadro FX 4600

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50

83%

#406

Quadro FX 5600

MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50

75%

#408

Quadro FX 3500

MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599

71%

#409

Quadro FX 1400

MSRP: $799|Avg: $30

67%

#410

GRID K1

MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120

67%

#412

GRID P4-1Q

MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185

50%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro 7000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 124.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 7000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro 7000	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-124.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+124.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+50%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $300 for the Quadro 7000, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 798% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro 7000	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+798%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro 7000 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro 7000 and GeForce GTX 1650

Quadro 7000

The Quadro 7000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 2 2012. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,505 points. Launch price was $14,499.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro 7000 scores 3,505 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 124.5%. The Quadro 7000 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro 7000) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.3322 TFLOPS (Quadro 7000) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	Quadro 7000	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	3,505	7,869+125%
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Turing
Process Node	40 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	512	896+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.3322 TFLOPS	2.984 TFLOPS+124%
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	64+14%	56
L1 Cache	896 KB	896 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 7000	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 7000 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The Quadro 7000 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Quadro 7000) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro 7000	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+50%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1 MB+33%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 7000 draws 204W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 92.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 7000) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro 7000	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	204W	75W-63%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	17.2	104.9+510%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro 7000 launched at $14499 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 75% less ($225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.7 (Quadro 7000) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 796.6% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).