Quadro FX 1100 vs Quadro FX 1300

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1100

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1300

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
······

Quadro FX 1100 vs Quadro FX 1300 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1100 vs Quadro FX 1300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1100 vs Quadro FX 1300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1100

2008

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • More future proof: Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) on 55nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • 18900% longer card at 190mm vs 1mm.

Quadro FX 1300

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Measures 1mm instead of 190mm, a 189mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 1100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.9% in PassMark G3D (36 vs 34), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 1100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 1300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1300 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1100 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1100 vs Quadro FX 1300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1100

The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1300

The Quadro FX 1300 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1100 scores 36 versus the Quadro FX 1300's 34 — the Quadro FX 1100 leads by 5.9%. The Quadro FX 1100 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX 1300 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1100) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1300). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1300).

FeatureQuadro FX 1100Quadro FX 1300
G3D Mark Score
36+6%
34
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
240
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 1100Quadro FX 1300
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1100 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1300 carries 128 MB. Quadro FX 1100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1100 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1300.

FeatureQuadro FX 1100Quadro FX 1300
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB+100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9_0a (Quadro FX 1100) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 1100Quadro FX 1300
DirectX
9_0a
9_0a
Max Displays
2
2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1100 draws 189W versus the Quadro FX 1300's 189W — a 0% difference. The Quadro FX 1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1100) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro FX 1100Quadro FX 1300
TDP
189W
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
190mm
1mm
Slots
1
1
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 1100 came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 1300 launched at $599. On MSRP, Quadro FX 1100 was 100+% cheaper ($599 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 1100) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1300) — the Quadro FX 1100 offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureQuadro FX 1100Quadro FX 1300
MSRP
$0-100%
$599
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.1
Codename
GT200B
GT200B
Release
November 11 2008
November 11 2008
Ranking
#815
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.