Quadro FX 1600M
VS
GeForce 7950 GX2

Quadro FX 1600M vs GeForce 7950 GX2

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1600M

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 7950 GX2

2016Core: 795 MHzBoost: 861 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1600M is positioned at rank 298 and the GeForce 7950 GX2 is on rank 729, so the Quadro FX 1600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1600M

#115
Radeon Instinct MI60
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600
99%
#283
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
7576%
#298
Quadro FX 1600M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#299
GRID K220Q
MSRP: $469|Avg: $40
99%
#301
FirePro W9100
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200
99%
#302
GRID T4-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000
97%
#303
FirePro 3D V3700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
93%
#304
GRID T4-1Q
MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600
90%
#305
GRID M60-2Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
89%
#306
NVS 310
MSRP: $159|Avg: $10
89%
#308
FirePro 3D V3750
MSRP: $199|Avg: $25
88%
#309
NVS 810
MSRP: $700|Avg: $80
87%
#310
GRID P40-2Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340
86%
#311
Quadro 2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
84%
#312
FirePro 3D V8800
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30
84%
#313
Quadro K5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 7950 GX2

#719
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
31932%
#721
28947%
#722
28871%
#726
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
26253%
#727
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
26074%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
100%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
97%
#732
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
88%
#733
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
88%
#734
GeForce 6200
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
85%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
65%
#737
MOBILITY RADEON 9800
MSRP: $229|Avg: $25
59%
#738
RADEON 9500
MSRP: $179|Avg: $30
59%
#739
RADEON X850 XT
MSRP: $499|Avg: $50
47%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
44%
#742
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
29%
#743
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
29%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
24%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The GeForce 7950 GX2 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1600M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1600M.

InsightQuadro FX 1600MGeForce 7950 GX2
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%)
Leading raw performance (+3.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 7950 GX2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1600M and GeForce 7950 GX2

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1600M

The Quadro FX 1600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce 7950 GX2

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 795 MHz to 861 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 23W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 202 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1600M scores 195 and the GeForce 7950 GX2 reaches 202 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 7950 GX2 uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 512 (GeForce 7950 GX2). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 0.8817 TFLOPS (GeForce 7950 GX2).

FeatureQuadro FX 1600MGeForce 7950 GX2
G3D Mark Score
195
202+4%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
512+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.8817 TFLOPS+42%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+150%
32
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 1600MGeForce 7950 GX2
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1600M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 7950 GX2 has 1 GB. The GeForce 7950 GX2 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 7950 GX2) — the GeForce 7950 GX2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 1600MGeForce 7950 GX2
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1600M draws 189W versus the GeForce 7950 GX2's 23W — a 156.6% difference. The GeForce 7950 GX2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 350W (GeForce 7950 GX2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureQuadro FX 1600MGeForce 7950 GX2
TDP
189W
23W-88%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
1.0
8.8+780%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 7950 GX2 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 1600MGeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$80
Codename
GT200B
GM107
Release
November 11 2008
June 28 2016
Ranking
#815
#764