Quadro FX 1600M vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1600M vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1600M vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1600M

2008

Why buy it

✅1.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌320% higher power demand at 189W vs 45W.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 189W, a 144W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 4650 AGP instead at 208 vs 195, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 4650 AGP makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4650 AGP is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1600M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1600M vs Radeon HD 4650 AGP Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1600M

The Quadro FX 1600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 4650 AGP

The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 208 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 1600M scores 195 versus the Radeon HD 4650 AGP's 208 — the Radeon HD 4650 AGP leads by 6.7%. The Quadro FX 1600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 4650 AGP uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650 AGP).

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
G3D Mark Score	195	208+7%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	480+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+8%	0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+233%	24
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1600M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4650 AGP.

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1600M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 4650 AGP's 45W — a 123.1% difference. The Radeon HD 4650 AGP is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4650 AGP). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
TDP	189W	45W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	193mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	1.0	4.6+360%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 4650 AGP (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 4650 AGP
MSRP	—	$80
Codename	GT200B	Onega
Release	November 11 2008	April 19 2011
Ranking	#815	#926

Search Quadro FX 1600M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 4650 AGP on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.