GeForce 9400 GT vs Quadro FX 1600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9400 GT vs Quadro FX 1600M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9400 GT vs Quadro FX 1600M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9400 GT

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 189W, a 156W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1600M

2008

Why buy it

✅5.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
❌472.7% higher power demand at 189W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (195 vs 191), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9400 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9400 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 1600M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9400 GT vs Quadro FX 1600M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9400 GT

The GeForce 9400 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.

Quadro FX 1600M

The Quadro FX 1600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9400 GT scores 191 and the Quadro FX 1600M reaches 195 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400 GT is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 1600M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1600M). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1600M).

Feature	GeForce 9400 GT	Quadro FX 1600M
G3D Mark Score	191	195+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS+45%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	24	80+233%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9400 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1600M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 9400 GT	Quadro FX 1600M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9400 GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1600M carries 512 MB. GeForce 9400 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400 GT and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1600M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1600M) — the GeForce 9400 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 9400 GT	Quadro FX 1600M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9400 GT draws 33W versus the Quadro FX 1600M's 189W — a 140.5% difference. The GeForce 9400 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1600M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce 9400 GT	Quadro FX 1600M
TDP	33W-83%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	5.8+480%	1.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 9400 GT (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9400 GT	Quadro FX 1600M
MSRP	$59	—
Codename	GM108	GT200B
Release	March 13 2015	November 11 2008
Ranking	#847	#815

Search GeForce 9400 GT on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 1600M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.