GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 7310G
GeForce 9400 GT
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7310G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9400 GT is positioned at rank 573 and the Radeon HD 7310G is on rank 269, so the Radeon HD 7310G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400 GT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7310G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9400 GT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7310G.
| Insight | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7310G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7310G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $20), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 89.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+89.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9400 GT and Radeon HD 7310G
GeForce 9400 GT
The GeForce 9400 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.
Radeon HD 7310G
The Radeon HD 7310G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 181 points. Launch price was $59.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 9400 GT scores 191 versus the Radeon HD 7310G's 181 — the GeForce 9400 GT leads by 5.5%. The GeForce 9400 GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7310G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7310G). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310G).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 191+6% | 181 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+47% | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+100% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9400 GT comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7310G has 512 MB. The GeForce 9400 GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7310G) — the GeForce 9400 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7310G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9400 GT) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7310G). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400 GT draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 7310G's 47W — a 35% difference. The GeForce 9400 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7310G). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-30% | 47W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+49% | 3.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9400 GT launched at $59 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Radeon HD 7310G launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 7310G costs 50% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 18.1 (Radeon HD 7310G) — the Radeon HD 7310G offers 88.5% better value. The GeForce 9400 GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59 | $50-15% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $10-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 18.1+89% |
| Codename | GM108 | Cape Verde |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #847 | #841 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9400 GT and Radeon HD 7310G
