Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce 9400 GT

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M Performance Spectrum

GeForce 9400 GT
1 GB 33
191
0.0%
brand logoGeForce Go 6800
brand logoGeForce 9300
brand logoGeForce Go 7700
brand logoGeForce 8500 GT
brand logoGeForce GTX 1630
brand logoGeForce GTX 970
brand logoGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Radeon HD 6320M
0.5 GB 186
198
+3.7%
brand logoRadeon HD 4270
brand logoMOBILITY RADEON X1800
brand logoRadeon HD 7340
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 530v
brand logoRadeon R9 M395
brand logoRadeon RX 6500 XT
brand logoRadeon RX 5700
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra3 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra3 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
GeForce 9400 GT
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
1080P
Radeon HD 6320M
low9 FPS
medium7 FPS
high6 FPS
ultra4 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9400 GT

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 186W, a 153W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6320M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6320M

2011

Why buy it

  • ✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
  • ❌463.6% higher power demand at 186W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6320M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.7% in PassMark G3D (198 vs 191), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9400 GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400 GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6320M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 6320M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9400 GT

The GeForce 9400 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 6320M

The Radeon HD 6320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 198 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9400 GT scores 191 and the Radeon HD 6320M reaches 198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400 GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6320M uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320M). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320M).

FeatureGeForce 9400 GTRadeon HD 6320M
G3D Mark Score
191
198+4%
Architecture
Maxwell
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1280+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+113%
ROPs
8
32+300%
TMUs
24
80+233%
L1 Cache
192 KB
320 KB+67%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 9400 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6320M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 9400 GTRadeon HD 6320M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9400 GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6320M carries 512 MB. GeForce 9400 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400 GT and System on the Radeon HD 6320M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6320M) — the GeForce 9400 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 9400 GTRadeon HD 6320M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 9400 GTRadeon HD 6320M
DirectX
10.0
11.2+12%
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
4.4+33%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9400 GT) vs None (Radeon HD 6320M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 6320M).

FeatureGeForce 9400 GTRadeon HD 6320M
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
UVD 3
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9400 GT draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 6320M's 186W — a 139.7% difference. The GeForce 9400 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320M). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 95.

FeatureGeForce 9400 GTRadeon HD 6320M
TDP
33W-82%
186W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
65°C-32%
95
Perf/Watt
5.8+427%
1.1
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 9400 GT (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce 9400 GTRadeon HD 6320M
MSRP
$59
—
Codename
GM108
Cayman
Release
March 13 2015
December 1 2011
Ranking
#847
#598
Search GeForce 9400 GT on AmazonSearch Radeon HD 6320M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.