GeForce 9400 GT
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
GeForce 9400 GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9400 GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
GeForce 9400 GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9400 GT
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $140 less on MSRP ($59 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 235.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 1.0 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
2009Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2009 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌237.3% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$59 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400 GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 9400 GT
The GeForce 9400 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9400 GT scores 191 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT reaches 192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400 GT is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 191 | 192 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800 ×2+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+3% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40 ×2+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9400 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9400 GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT carries 256 MB. GeForce 9400 GT gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400 GT and 64-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the GeForce 9400 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9400 GT) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs Avivo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400 GT draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8 | 6.4+10% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9400 GT came in at $59, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, GeForce 9400 GT was 70.4% cheaper ($140 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 1.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the GeForce 9400 GT offers 220% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9400 GT (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59-70% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2+220% | 1.0 |
| Codename | GM108 | M98 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #847 | #818 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9400 GT and Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
