GeForce 9400 GT vs Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
GeForce 9400 GT
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 9400 GT is positioned at rank 573 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is on rank 697, so the GeForce 9400 GT offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400 GT
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce 9400 GT is significantly newer (2015 vs 2009). The GeForce 9400 GT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9400 GT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $20), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($12) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 9400 GT and Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
GeForce 9400 GT
The GeForce 9400 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9400 GT scores 191 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT reaches 192 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400 GT is built on Maxwell while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 191 | 192 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800 ×2+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS+3% | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 ×2+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40 ×2+67% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+20% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9400 GT comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT has 256 MB. The GeForce 9400 GT offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the GeForce 9400 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+300% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9400 GT) vs Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs Avivo HD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | Avivo HD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400 GT draws 33W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8 | 6.4+10% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 9400 GT launched at $59 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199 and now averages $12. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT costs 40% less ($8 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.6 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 16.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT offers 66.7% better value. The GeForce 9400 GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59-70% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $12-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.6 | 16.0+67% |
| Codename | GM108 | M98 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #847 | #818 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 9400 GT and Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
