
GeForce 9400 GT

Radeon HD 8210
GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 8210 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 8210 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 8210: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 9400 GT
2015Why buy it
- β 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.
- β More future proof: Maxwell (2014β2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD 8210 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β68.6% HIGHER MSRP$59 MSRPvs$35 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 5.6 G3D/$ ($59 MSRP vs $35 MSRP).
Radeon HD 8210
2012Why buy it
- β 7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $24 less on MSRP ($35 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
- β Delivers 72.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.6 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs $59 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9400 GT vs Radeon HD 8210 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9400 GT
The GeForce 9400 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.

Radeon HD 8210
The Radeon HD 8210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 9400 GT scores 191 and the Radeon HD 8210 reaches 195 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9400 GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8210 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8210). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8210).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 8210 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 191 | 195+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 2.56 TFLOPS+183% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 9400 GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8210 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 8210 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 9400 GT has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8210 carries 512 MB. GeForce 9400 GT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 9400 GT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8210. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8210) β the GeForce 9400 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 8210 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 9400 GT draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 8210's 200W β a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 9400 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8210). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 8210 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-84% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | β |
| Height | 111mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 65Β°C | β |
| Perf/Watt | 5.8+480% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 9400 GT came in at $59, while the Radeon HD 8210 launched at $35. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8210 was 40.7% cheaper ($24 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 9400 GT) vs 5.6 (Radeon HD 8210) β the Radeon HD 8210 offers 75% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 9400 GT (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 9400 GT | Radeon HD 8210 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $59 | $35-41% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 5.6+75% |
| Codename | GM108 | Pitcairn |
| Release | March 13 2015 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #847 | #460 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














