CPU
GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 1600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is positioned at rank 697 and the Quadro FX 1600M is on rank 298, so the Quadro FX 1600M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1600M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 1600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Quadro FX 1600M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and Quadro FX 1600M
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.
Quadro FX 1600M
The Quadro FX 1600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT scores 192 and the Quadro FX 1600M reaches 195 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is built on TeraScale while the Quadro FX 1600M uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1600M). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1600M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Quadro FX 1600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 192 | 195+2% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2+233% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2+41% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 ×2 | 80+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Quadro FX 1600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1600M has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 1600M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Quadro FX 1600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT draws 30W versus the Quadro FX 1600M's 189W — a 145.2% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Quadro FX 1600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4+540% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is the newer GPU (2009 vs 2008).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Quadro FX 1600M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $12 | — |
| Codename | M98 | GT200B |
| Release | January 9 2009 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #818 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and Quadro FX 1600M
