Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT vs RADEON HD7450
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:
RADEON HD7450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is positioned at rank 697 and the RADEON HD7450 is on rank 259, so the RADEON HD7450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Per Dollar RADEON HD7450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON HD7450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $15), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 20.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($12) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and RADEON HD7450
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.
RADEON HD7450
The RADEON HD7450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 199 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT scores 192 and the RADEON HD7450 reaches 199 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is built on TeraScale while the RADEON HD7450 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 1,792 (RADEON HD7450). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (RADEON HD7450).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 192 | 199+4% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2 | 1792+124% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 | 2.867 TFLOPS+226% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 ×2 | 112+180% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 448 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD7450 has 512 MB. The RADEON HD7450 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 768 KB (RADEON HD7450) — the RADEON HD7450 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 11.2 (RADEON HD7450). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2+12% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs VCE 1.0 (RADEON HD7450). Decoder: Avivo HD vs UVD 3.1.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | Avivo HD | UVD 3.1 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT draws 30W versus the RADEON HD7450's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 350W (RADEON HD7450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-85% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4+540% | 1.0 |
Value Analysis
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $12, while the RADEON HD7450 launched at $50 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT costs 20% less ($3 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 13.3 (RADEON HD7450) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT offers 20.3% better value. The RADEON HD7450 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | RADEON HD7450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $50-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $12-20% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.0+20% | 13.3 |
| Codename | M98 | Tahiti |
| Release | January 9 2009 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #818 | #454 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and RADEON HD7450
