Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT vs Radeon HD 6320M
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6320M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is positioned at rank 697 and the Radeon HD 6320M is on rank 261, so the Radeon HD 6320M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6320M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6320M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT.
| Insight | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Radeon HD 6320M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6320M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and Radeon HD 6320M
Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 192 points.
Radeon HD 6320M
The Radeon HD 6320M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 198 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT scores 192 and the Radeon HD 6320M reaches 198 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 6320M uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6320M). Raw compute: 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6320M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Radeon HD 6320M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 192 | 198+3% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 800 ×2 | 1280+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.88 TFLOPS ×2 | 1.92 TFLOPS+118% |
| ROPs | 16 ×2 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 ×2 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 320 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Radeon HD 6320M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6320M has 512 MB. The Radeon HD 6320M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6320M) — the Radeon HD 6320M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Radeon HD 6320M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6320M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Radeon HD 6320M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 11.2+12% |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4+33% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs None (Radeon HD 6320M). Decoder: Avivo HD vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 6320M).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Radeon HD 6320M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo HD | None |
| Decoder | Avivo HD | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6320M's 186W — a 144.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6320M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 95.
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Radeon HD 6320M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-84% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-26% | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 6.4+482% | 1.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6320M is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT | Radeon HD 6320M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $12 | — |
| Codename | M98 | Cayman |
| Release | January 9 2009 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #818 | #598 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Mobility Radeon HD 2600 XT and Radeon HD 6320M
