Quadro FX 1600M vs Radeon HD 8210E

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1600M vs Radeon HD 8210E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1600M vs Radeon HD 8210E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1600M

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8210E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8210E

2012

Why buy it

✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8210E is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 1600M instead at 195 vs 194, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 1600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8210E makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8210E is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1600M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1600M vs Radeon HD 8210E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1600M

The Quadro FX 1600M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8210E

The Radeon HD 8210E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 194 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1600M scores 195 and the Radeon HD 8210E reaches 194 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1600M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8210E uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8210E). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8210E).

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 8210E
G3D Mark Score	195	194
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS+312%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 8210E
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1600M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8210E. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8210E) — the Radeon HD 8210E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 8210E
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1600M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8210E's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 1600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1600M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8210E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 8210E
TDP	189W-6%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	1.0	1.0

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 8210E (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 1600M	Radeon HD 8210E
MSRP	—	$50
Codename	GT200B	Pitcairn
Release	November 11 2008	March 5 2012
Ranking	#815	#460

Search Quadro FX 1600M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8210E on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.