CPU
GPU
Quadro FX 1700M
Popular choices:
GeForce 8600 GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 1700M is positioned at rank 129 and the GeForce 8600 GS is on rank 658, so the Quadro FX 1700M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8600 GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 8600 GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1700M.
| Insight | Quadro FX 1700M | GeForce 8600 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce 8600 GS remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 1700M and GeForce 8600 GS
Quadro FX 1700M
The Quadro FX 1700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 173 points. Launch price was $3,499.
GeForce 8600 GS
The GeForce 8600 GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1700M scores 173 and the GeForce 8600 GS reaches 179 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 8600 GS uses G9x, both on 55 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 224 (GeForce 8600 GS).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700M | GeForce 8600 GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 173 | 179+3% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 240+7% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700M | GeForce 8600 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700M | GeForce 8600 GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 10_0 (GeForce 8600 GS). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700M | GeForce 8600 GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0)+11% | 10_0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro FX 1700M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 (GeForce 8600 GS).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700M | GeForce 8600 GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | PureVideo HD |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1700M draws 189W versus the GeForce 8600 GS's 150W — a 23% difference. The GeForce 8600 GS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 350W (GeForce 8600 GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1700M | GeForce 8600 GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 150W-21% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 78°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9 | 1.2+33% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 1700M and GeForce 8600 GS
