Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 3450

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3450

2008Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 3450 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1700M

2008

Why buy it

  • 9.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 71.8% higher power demand at 189W vs 110W.

Radeon HD 3450

2008

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 110W instead of 189W, a 79W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1700M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 1700M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 3450 instead at 179 vs 173, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 1700M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3450 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3450 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1700M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700M

The Quadro FX 1700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 173 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 3450

The Radeon HD 3450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1700M scores 173 and the Radeon HD 3450 reaches 179 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 3450 uses TeraScale, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 3450). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3450).

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 3450
G3D Mark Score
173
179+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
240
800+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1 TFLOPS+61%
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
80+100%
40
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 3450
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700M and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 3450.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 3450
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1700M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 3450's 110W — a 52.8% difference. The Radeon HD 3450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 3450
TDP
189W
110W-42%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.9
1.6+78%