GeForce GT 325M
VS
Quadro FX 1700M

GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

2013Core: 980 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 325M is positioned at rank 274 and the Quadro FX 1700M is on rank 129, so the Quadro FX 1700M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M

#264
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
639%
#266
579%
#267
577%
#271
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
525%
#272
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
521%
#274
GeForce GT 325M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
100%
#275
GeForce GTS 160M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#276
GeForce GTX 470M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60
100%
#277
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 3 3200G
MSRP: $99|Avg: $70
99%
#279
Radeon RX Vega 9
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
99%
#282
Iris Xe Graphics G7
MSRP: $200|Avg: $100
97%
#283
Radeon R9 M395
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#285
GeForce GT 755M SLI
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
96%
#286
GeForce GTX 950A
MSRP: $159|Avg: $30
96%
#288
Radeon 540X
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
94%
#289
GeForce 930MX
MSRP: $80|Avg: $25
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1700M

#66
Radeon PRO W7800
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
94%
#67
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450
90%
#114
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1281%
#129
Quadro FX 1700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#130
FirePro D300
MSRP: $500|Avg: $20
99%
#131
Radeon Pro WX 3200
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
96%
#132
Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
96%
#134
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
93%
#135
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
MSRP: $600|Avg: $200
92%
#136
Quadro P3000
MSRP: $600|Avg: $80
92%
#139
Quadro T1000 (móvel)
MSRP: $500|Avg: $120
87%
#140
Radeon Pro V520
MSRP: $800|Avg: $300
87%
#141
Quadro M5500
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
86%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
86%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
85%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 325M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 325MQuadro FX 1700M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%)
Leading raw performance (+1.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 325M and Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700M

The Quadro FX 1700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 173 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 325M scores 170 and the Quadro FX 1700M reaches 173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1700M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1700M). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700M).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MQuadro FX 1700M
G3D Mark Score
170
173+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS+21%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 325MQuadro FX 1700M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 325M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1700M has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MQuadro FX 1700M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro FX 1700M). OpenGL: 3.2 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MQuadro FX 1700M
DirectX
11 (10_1)
11.1 (10_0)
OpenGL
3.2
3.3+3%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GT 325M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro FX 1700M).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MQuadro FX 1700M
Encoder
CUDA
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 1700M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1700M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MQuadro FX 1700M
TDP
50W-74%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
3.4+278%
0.9
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 325M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MQuadro FX 1700M
Avg Price (30d)
$20
Codename
GK107
GT200B
Release
June 25 2013
November 11 2008
Ranking
#726
#815