GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 1500M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 1500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 1500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 325M

2013

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 1500M

2008

Why buy it

✅17.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 1500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (171 vs 170), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 325M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 1500M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 1500M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 325M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 1500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

Quadro FX 1500M

The Quadro FX 1500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 171 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 325M scores 170 and the Quadro FX 1500M reaches 171 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1500M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1500M). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1500M).

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 1500M
G3D Mark Score	170	171
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS+21%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 325M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 1500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 1500M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 325M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1500M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 325M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 325M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1500M.

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 1500M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 1500M's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.