GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 380

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 325M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quadro FX 380

2008

Why buy it

✅17.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.1% in PassMark G3D (177 vs 170), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 325M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 256 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 325M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 325M vs Quadro FX 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

Quadro FX 380

The Quadro FX 380 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 177 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 325M scores 170 and the Quadro FX 380 reaches 177 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 380 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 380). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380).

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 380
G3D Mark Score	170	177+4%
Architecture	Kepler	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	384+60%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7526 TFLOPS+21%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 325M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 380 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 380
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 325M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 380 carries 256 MB. GeForce GT 325M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 325M and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 380.

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 380
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+300%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M) vs 10_0 (Quadro FX 380). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 380
DirectX	11 (10_1)+10%	10_0
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the Quadro FX 380's 189W — a 116.3% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 380
TDP	50W-74%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Perf/Watt	3.4+278%	0.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 325M (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce GT 325M	Quadro FX 380
MSRP	—	$129
Codename	GK107	GT200B
Release	June 25 2013	November 11 2008
Ranking	#726	#815

Search GeForce GT 325M on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.