GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3670

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3670 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 325M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 250W, a 200W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3670

2010

Why buy it

  • 19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 400% higher power demand at 250W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 325M instead at 170 vs 169, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 325M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 325M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3670

The Radeon HD 3670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 169 points. Launch price was $369.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 325M scores 170 and the Radeon HD 3670 reaches 169 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 3670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 3670). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3670).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3670
G3D Mark Score
170
169
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384
1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+259%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
96+200%
L1 Cache
32 KB
192 KB+500%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 325M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3670 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3670
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 325M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3670 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 325M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 325M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3670. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 325M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 3670) — the Radeon HD 3670 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3670
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 325M) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3670). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3670
DirectX
11 (10_1)+9%
10.1
Max Displays
2
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: CUDA (GeForce GT 325M) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3670). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3670
Encoder
CUDA
UVD
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
UVD
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 3670's 250W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3670
TDP
50W-80%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
0
Perf/Watt
3.4+386%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 325M (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3670
MSRP
$100
Codename
GK107
Cayman
Release
June 25 2013
December 14 2010
Ranking
#726
#596

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.