GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3450
GeForce GT 325M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 3450
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 325M is positioned at rank 274 and the Radeon HD 3450 is on rank 273, so the Radeon HD 3450 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 325M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3450
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 325M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 325M | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3450 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3450 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $20), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 40.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 325M | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+40.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 325M and Radeon HD 3450
GeForce GT 325M
The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.
Radeon HD 3450
The Radeon HD 3450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 325M scores 170 versus the Radeon HD 3450's 179 — the Radeon HD 3450 leads by 5.3%. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 3450 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 3450). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3450).
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 170 | 179+5% |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7526 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS+33% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 325M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3450 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 325M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 3450's 110W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-55% | 110W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.4+112% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3450 costs 25% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 11.9 (Radeon HD 3450) — the Radeon HD 3450 offers 40% better value. The GeForce GT 325M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce GT 325M | Radeon HD 3450 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $15-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 11.9+40% |
| Codename | GK107 | RV770 |
| Release | June 25 2013 | June 25 2008 |
| Ranking | #726 | #876 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 325M and Radeon HD 3450
