GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3450

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

2013Core: 980 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 3450

2008Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3450 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3450 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3450: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 325M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 50W instead of 110W, a 60W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3450

2008

Why buy it

  • 7.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 120% higher power demand at 110W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 3450 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 5.3% in PassMark G3D (179 vs 170), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 325M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3450 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3450 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 325M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 325M vs Radeon HD 3450 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 325M

The GeForce GT 325M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 25 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 170 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 3450

The Radeon HD 3450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $199.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 325M scores 170 versus the Radeon HD 3450's 179 — the Radeon HD 3450 leads by 5.3%. The GeForce GT 325M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 3450 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 325M) vs 800 (Radeon HD 3450). Raw compute: 0.7526 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 325M) vs 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3450).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3450
G3D Mark Score
170
179+5%
Architecture
Kepler
TeraScale
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384
800+108%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7526 TFLOPS
1 TFLOPS+33%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
160 KB+400%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 325M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3450 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3450
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 325M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3450 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 325M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 325M and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 3450.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3450
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 325M draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 3450's 110W — a 75% difference. The GeForce GT 325M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 325M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3450). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3450
TDP
50W-55%
110W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
3.4+112%
1.6
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 325M (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce GT 325MRadeon HD 3450
MSRP
$50
Codename
GK107
RV770
Release
June 25 2013
June 25 2008
Ranking
#726
#876

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.