Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 6230

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6230

2011Core: 750 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 6230 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 6230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 6230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1700M

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6230 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6230

2011

Why buy it

  • 1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6230 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.5% in PassMark G3D (179 vs 173), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 1700M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6230 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6230 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1700M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1700M vs Radeon HD 6230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1700M

The Quadro FX 1700M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 173 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 6230

The Radeon HD 6230 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $180.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1700M scores 173 and the Radeon HD 6230 reaches 179 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1700M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6230 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6230). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6230).

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 6230
G3D Mark Score
173
179+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.92 TFLOPS+209%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80
80
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 6230
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1700M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6230. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6230) — the Radeon HD 6230 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 6230
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6230). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 6230
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.2
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD 2.2.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 6230
Encoder
UVD 2.2
Decoder
PureVideo HD
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1700M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6230's 186W — a 1.6% difference. The Radeon HD 6230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1700M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6230). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 6230
TDP
189W
186W-2%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
168mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
0.9
1.0+11%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 6230 (2011 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 1700MRadeon HD 6230
MSRP
$50
Codename
GT200B
Cayman
Release
November 11 2008
December 1 2011
Ranking
#815
#598

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.