Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M315

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M315

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M315 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M315 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M315: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 1800M

2008

Why buy it

  • 52.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M315

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1800M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 1800M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 52.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M315 instead at 489 vs 486, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 1800M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 M315 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M315 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 1800M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M315 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800M

The Quadro FX 1800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 486 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon R5 M315

The Radeon R5 M315 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 1800M scores 486 and the Radeon R5 M315 reaches 489 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M315 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1800M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M315). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800M) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M315).

FeatureQuadro FX 1800MRadeon R5 M315
G3D Mark Score
486
489
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
320+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.6592 TFLOPS+6%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+300%
20
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 1800MRadeon R5 M315
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 1800M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M315 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 1800M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1800M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M315. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 1800M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M315) — the Quadro FX 1800M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 1800MRadeon R5 M315
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 1800M draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 M315's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon R5 M315 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1800M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M315). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro FX 1800MRadeon R5 M315
TDP
189W
75W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
2.6
6.5+150%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 M315 (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 1800MRadeon R5 M315
MSRP
$150
Codename
GT200B
Jet
Release
November 11 2008
May 15 2016
Ranking
#815
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.