GeForce GT 625M
VS
Quadro FX 1800M

GeForce GT 625M vs Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 625M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 625M is positioned at rank 219 and the Quadro FX 1800M is on rank 62, so the Quadro FX 1800M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 625M

#52
Radeon 8060S
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
93%
#53
Radeon RX 6850M XT
MSRP: $800|Avg: $800
89%
#209
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
448%
#211
406%
#212
405%
#216
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
368%
#217
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
366%
#219
GeForce GT 625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#221
Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
97%
#222
96%
#224
GeForce GT 640M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
94%
#228
GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
MSRP: $149|Avg: $40
92%
#230
Maxwell GPU Surface Book
MSRP: $150|Avg: $75
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1800M

#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
96%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
95%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
95%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
91%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
89%
#47
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
608%
#62
Quadro FX 1800M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#63
T400 4GB
MSRP: $159|Avg: $99
98%
#64
Radeon Pro 5300
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
98%
#69
Radeon Pro W5500
MSRP: $399|Avg: $300
92%
#72
Quadro P2200
MSRP: $429|Avg: $227
90%
#73
T1000
MSRP: $350|Avg: $382
90%
#74
Quadro P620
MSRP: $170|Avg: $48
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1800M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 625M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GT 625MQuadro FX 1800M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%)
Leading raw performance (+0.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1800M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 625M and Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 625M

The GeForce GT 625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 485 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800M

The Quadro FX 1800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 486 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 625M scores 485 and the Quadro FX 1800M reaches 486 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1800M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 625M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1800M). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800M).

FeatureGeForce GT 625MQuadro FX 1800M
G3D Mark Score
485
486
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS+17%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
80+150%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 625MQuadro FX 1800M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 625M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1800M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 625M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 625MQuadro FX 1800M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 625M) vs 11.1 (10_1) (Quadro FX 1800M). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 625MQuadro FX 1800M
DirectX
11.0
11.1 (10_1)
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
4.0+21%
3.3
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 625M) vs None (Quadro FX 1800M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD (VP4). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 625M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 1800M).

FeatureGeForce GT 625MQuadro FX 1800M
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD (VP4)
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 625M draws 45W versus the Quadro FX 1800M's 189W — a 123.1% difference. The GeForce GT 625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 625M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce GT 625MQuadro FX 1800M
TDP
45W-76%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75°C-12%
85
Perf/Watt
10.8+315%
2.6