GeForce GT 625M vs Radeon HD 8650G

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 625M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8650G

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 625M vs Radeon HD 8650G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 625M vs Radeon HD 8650G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 625M vs Radeon HD 8650G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 625M

2012

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8650G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8650G

2012

Why buy it

  • 68.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 8650G is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 68.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.3% in PassMark G3D (501 vs 485), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 625M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8650G makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8650G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 625M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 625M vs Radeon HD 8650G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 625M

The GeForce GT 625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 485 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 8650G

The Radeon HD 8650G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 501 points. Launch price was $249.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 625M scores 485 and the Radeon HD 8650G reaches 501 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8650G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 625M) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650G). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8650G). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 625MRadeon HD 8650G
G3D Mark Score
485
501+3%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
1024+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
1.761 TFLOPS+141%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1000 MHz+5%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
32 KB
256 KB+700%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 625M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8650G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 625MRadeon HD 8650G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 625M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650G carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 625M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8650G. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 625M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8650G) — the Radeon HD 8650G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 625MRadeon HD 8650G
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 625M draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 8650G's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce GT 625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 625M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GT 625MRadeon HD 8650G
TDP
45W-65%
130W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
10.8+177%
3.9