GeForce GT 625M vs Quadro K500M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 625M vs Quadro K500M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 625M vs Quadro K500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 625M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K500M

2013

Why buy it

✅71.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 71.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 625M instead at 485 vs 480, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 625M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K500M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro K500M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 625M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 625M vs Quadro K500M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 625M

The GeForce GT 625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 485 points.

Quadro K500M

The Quadro K500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 480 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 625M scores 485 and the Quadro K500M reaches 480 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 625M is built on Kepler while the Quadro K500M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 625M) vs 1,536 (Quadro K500M). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 625M) vs 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K500M).

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	Quadro K500M
G3D Mark Score	485+1%	480
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	2.369 TFLOPS+225%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	32 KB	128 KB+300%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 625M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K500M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	Quadro K500M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 625M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K500M carries 4 GB. Quadro K500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625M and 64-bit on the Quadro K500M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 625M) vs 512 KB (Quadro K500M) — the Quadro K500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 625M	Quadro K500M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 625M draws 45W versus the Quadro K500M's 100W — a 75.9% difference. The GeForce GT 625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 625M) vs 350W (Quadro K500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.