
Quadro FX 1800M

Radeon R5 M420
Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M420 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M420 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 1800M
2008Why buy it
- ✅18.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.
Radeon R5 M420
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 1800M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 1800M vs Radeon R5 M420 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 1800M
The Quadro FX 1800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 486 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R5 M420
The Radeon R5 M420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 1800M scores 486 and the Radeon R5 M420 reaches 504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 1800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R5 M420 uses GCN 2.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 1800M) vs 768 (Radeon R5 M420). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800M) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M420).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800M | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 486 | 504+4% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 768+220% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS+147% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+67% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800M | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 1800M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M420 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 1800M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 1800M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M420.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800M | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (Quadro FX 1800M) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 M420). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800M | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1)+8% |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6+39% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 1800M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M420). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 1800M) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 M420).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800M | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP4) | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 1800M draws 189W versus the Radeon R5 M420's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon R5 M420 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 1800M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 80.
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800M | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 75W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 80-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 2.6 | 6.7+158% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R5 M420 (2016 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 1800M | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GT200B | Emerald |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #815 | #649 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














