
Quadro FX 2800M vs Quadro 410

Quadro FX 2800M
Popular choices:

Quadro 410
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 2800M is positioned at rank 106 and the Quadro 410 is on rank 251, so the Quadro FX 2800M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2800M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 410
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro 410 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 2800M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 2800M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro 410 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 2800M and Quadro 410

Quadro FX 2800M
The Quadro FX 2800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 415 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Quadro 410
The Quadro 410 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 427 points. Launch price was $1,499.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 2800M scores 415 and the Quadro 410 reaches 427 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 2800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro 410 uses Kepler, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 1,152 (Quadro 410). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 1.627 TFLOPS (Quadro 410).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 415 | 427+3% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 1152+380% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 1.627 TFLOPS+162% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 96+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 2800M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 410 has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 2800M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 512 KB (Quadro 410) — the Quadro 410 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 2800M draws 189W versus the Quadro 410's 100W — a 61.6% difference. The Quadro 410 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 2800M) vs 350W (Quadro 410). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 100W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 2.2 | 4.3+95% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro 410 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 2800M | Quadro 410 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $25 |
| Codename | GT200B | GK104 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #604 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











