Quadro FX 3500M vs Intel UHD Graphics 600

CPU

GPU

Quadro FX 3500M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Intel UHD Graphics 600

2014Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1050 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro FX 3500M

189

306

0.0%

GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

Intel UHD Graphics 600

312

+2.0%

Arc A370M

Arc A730M

Arc B580

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 3500M is positioned at rank #95 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3500M

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

100%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

98%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

97%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

94%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

94%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

92%

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

89%

#80

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

966%

#95

Quadro FX 3500M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

96%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

96%

#105

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The Intel UHD Graphics 600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 3500M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3500M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro FX 3500M	Intel UHD Graphics 600
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro FX 3500M Benchmark Check

Intel UHD Graphics 600 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3500M and Intel UHD Graphics 600

Quadro FX 3500M

The Quadro FX 3500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 306 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Intel UHD Graphics 600

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3500M scores 306 and the Intel UHD Graphics 600 reaches 312 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3500M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 uses Generation 8.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Intel UHD Graphics 600
G3D Mark Score	306	312+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	Generation 8.0
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	240+25%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS+54%	0.4032 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+967%	3
TMUs	80+233%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Intel UHD Graphics 600
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 600 has 0 MB. The Quadro FX 3500M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Intel UHD Graphics 600
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Intel UHD Graphics 600
DirectX	9.0c	12+33%
OpenGL	2.1	4.6+119%
Max Displays	1	3+200%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3500M) vs QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Decoder: VP1 vs QSV. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9 (Quadro FX 3500M) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500M	Intel UHD Graphics 600
Encoder	None	QSV
Decoder	VP1	QSV
Codecs	MPEG-2,WMV9	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500M draws 189W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 600's 15W — a 170.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 55°C.