Quadro FX 380 LP
VS
GeForce 9200M GE

Quadro FX 380 LP vs GeForce 9200M GE

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

2016Core: 965 MHzBoost: 993 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 380 LP is positioned at rank 362 and the GeForce 9200M GE is on rank 675, so the Quadro FX 380 LP offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 380 LP

#347
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
17178%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
100%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
94%
#365
FirePro 3D V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229
93%
#366
FirePro 3D V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80
93%
#367
Quadro 5000
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100
92%
#368
FirePro V9800
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250
91%
#369
FirePro V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $20
91%
#370
FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500
83%
#371
FirePro 3D V7750
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
79%
#372
GRID M10-2B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $80
77%
#373
Quadro FX 370
MSRP: $129|Avg: $500
76%
#374
RTXA5000-6Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $2500
71%
#375
Quadro 6000
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $150
71%
#376
GRID M6-0B
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
71%
#377
GRID M10-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9200M GE

#665
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
7540%
#667
6835%
#668
6817%
#672
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
6199%
#673
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
6156%
#675
GeForce 9200M GE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#676
Mobility Radeon. HD 5470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $25
99%
#677
GeForce 7500 LE
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#678
Radeon HD 2600 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $40
99%
#679
GeForce 9650M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#680
GeForce 9650M GS
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
94%
#681
GeForce 8400 SE
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
94%
#682
GeForce 8400M GT
MSRP: $50|Avg: $30
93%
#683
GeForce 9200M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $40
90%
#684
Mobility Radeon HD 3410
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
90%
#685
MOBILITY RADEON X700 XL
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
85%
#686
GeForce 9300M GS
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
82%
#687
Mobility Radeon HD 2400
MSRP: $79|Avg: $1
79%
#688
GeForce 6150 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
76%
#689
Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
MSRP: $449|Avg: $50
74%
#690
GeForce 9450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
73%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce 9200M GE is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The GeForce 9200M GE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 380 LP lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 380 LP is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9200M GE.

InsightQuadro FX 380 LPGeForce 9200M GE
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 380 LP offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 380 LP holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro FX 380 LPGeForce 9200M GE
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+0.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 380 LP and GeForce 9200M GE

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 380 LP

The Quadro FX 380 LP is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 145 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9200M GE

The GeForce 9200M GE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 144 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 380 LP scores 145 and the GeForce 9200M GE reaches 144 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 380 LP is built on Tesla 2.0 while the GeForce 9200M GE uses Maxwell, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 256 (GeForce 9200M GE). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 9200M GE).

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPGeForce 9200M GE
G3D Mark Score
145
144
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Maxwell
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
256+7%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS+22%
0.5084 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPGeForce 9200M GE
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9200M GE) — the GeForce 9200M GE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPGeForce 9200M GE
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 380 LP draws 189W versus the GeForce 9200M GE's 16W — a 168.8% difference. The GeForce 9200M GE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 350W (GeForce 9200M GE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPGeForce 9200M GE
TDP
189W
16W-92%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.8
9.0+1025%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro FX 380 LP launched at $169 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce 9200M GE launched at $100 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.7 (Quadro FX 380 LP) vs 9.6 (GeForce 9200M GE) — the Quadro FX 380 LP offers 1% better value. The GeForce 9200M GE is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 380 LPGeForce 9200M GE
MSRP
$169
$100-41%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$15
Performance per Dollar
9.7+1%
9.6
Codename
GT200B
GM108
Release
November 11 2008
March 25 2016
Ranking
#815
#864