Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Intel UHD Graphics 610
Quadro FX 4700 X2
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is positioned at rank #401 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4700 X2
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The Intel UHD Graphics 610 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 610 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4700 X2 and Intel UHD Graphics 610
Quadro FX 4700 X2
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Intel UHD Graphics 610
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 scores 676 and the Intel UHD Graphics 610 reaches 687 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Intel UHD Graphics 610 uses Generation 9.5, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm+++. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 676 | 687+2% |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Shading Units | 192+4% | 184 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS+9% | 0.4232 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24+700% | 3 |
| TMUs | 64+178% | 23 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 610 has 0 MB. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 draws 150W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 610's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 15W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5 | 45.8+918% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Intel UHD Graphics 610 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.1 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 610) — the Intel UHD Graphics 610 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | GT200B | Comet Lake GT2 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | October 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #884 | #824 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro FX 4700 X2 and Intel UHD Graphics 610
