
Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Radeon R8 M535DX

Quadro FX 4700 X2
Popular choices:

Radeon R8 M535DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is positioned at rank 401 and the Radeon R8 M535DX is on rank 498, so the Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 4700 X2
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R8 M535DX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R8 M535DX is significantly newer (2014 vs 2008). The Radeon R8 M535DX likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R8 M535DX.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 4700 X2 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 909% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+909%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 4700 X2 and Radeon R8 M535DX

Quadro FX 4700 X2
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon R8 M535DX
The Radeon R8 M535DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 670 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 scores 676 and the Radeon R8 M535DX reaches 670 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R8 M535DX uses GCN, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 896 (Radeon R8 M535DX).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 676 | 670 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 896+367% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R8 M535DX has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 draws 150W versus the Radeon R8 M535DX's 30W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon R8 M535DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 350W (Radeon R8 M535DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 30W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 4.5 | 22.3+396% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R8 M535DX launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.1 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 4.5 (Radeon R8 M535DX) — the Quadro FX 4700 X2 offers 902.2% better value. The Radeon R8 M535DX is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 4700 X2 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2999 | $150-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.1+902% | 4.5 |
| Codename | GT200B | — |
| Release | November 11 2008 | June 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #884 | #800 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















