Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4700 X2

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega 3

2019Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1001 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4700 X2

2008

Why buy it

  • 2.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
  • Radeon RX Vega 3 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Radeon RX Vega 3

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 4700 X2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX Vega 3 instead at 684 vs 676, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 4700 X2 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX 4700 X2 vs Radeon RX Vega 3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 4700 X2

The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 3

The Radeon RX Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1001 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 684 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4700 X2 scores 676 and the Radeon RX Vega 3 reaches 684 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 3 uses GCN 5.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 192 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 0.3844 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 3).

FeatureQuadro FX 4700 X2Radeon RX Vega 3
G3D Mark Score
676
684+1%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 5.0
Process Node
55 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
192
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4623 TFLOPS+20%
0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPs
24+500%
4
TMUs
64+433%
12

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 4700 X2Radeon RX Vega 3
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 4700 X2 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 carries 0 MB. Quadro FX 4700 X2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2 and System on the Radeon RX Vega 3.

FeatureQuadro FX 4700 X2Radeon RX Vega 3
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4700 X2 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX Vega 3's 15W — a 163.6% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 3). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureQuadro FX 4700 X2Radeon RX Vega 3
TDP
150W
15W-90%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
4.5
45.6+913%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4700 X2 came in at $2999, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 3 was 100+% cheaper ($2999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 3) — the Radeon RX Vega 3 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega 3 (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 4700 X2Radeon RX Vega 3
MSRP
$2999
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
Infinity
Codename
GT200B
Picasso
Release
November 11 2008
January 6 2019
Ranking
#884
#845

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.