
Intel UHD Graphics 610

Quadro FX 4700 X2
Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel UHD Graphics 610
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
Quadro FX 4700 X2
2008Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Intel UHD Graphics 610 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro FX 4700 X2 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 610
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.

Quadro FX 4700 X2
The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 scores 687 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 687+2% | 676 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 192+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS | 0.4623 TFLOPS+9% |
| ROPs | 3 | 24+700% |
| TMUs | 23 | 64+178% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 4700 X2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 610 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 draws 15W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-90% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 45.8+918% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 610 came in at $0, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 610 was 100+% cheaper ($2999 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the Intel UHD Graphics 610 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 610 (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro FX 4700 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $2999 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 0.2 |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | GT200B |
| Release | October 1 2017 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #824 | #884 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















