UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 610

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 150W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $35 MSRP).

Radeon R5 A6-7480

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($35 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Intel UHD Graphics 610 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌900% higher power demand at 150W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (697 vs 687), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 A6-7480 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon R5 A6-7480 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 610

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.

Radeon R5 A6-7480

The Radeon R5 A6-7480 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 29 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1120 MHz to 1266 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 697 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 scores 687 and the Radeon R5 A6-7480 reaches 697 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 uses GCN 4.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 2,304 (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 5.834 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1266 MHz.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon R5 A6-7480
G3D Mark Score	687	697+1%
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 4.0
Process Node	14 nm+++	14 nm
Shading Units	184	2304+1152%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4232 TFLOPS	5.834 TFLOPS+1279%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz	1266 MHz+10%
ROPs	3	32+967%
TMUs	23	144+526%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon R5 A6-7480
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 carries 512 MB. Radeon R5 A6-7480 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 610 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 A6-7480.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon R5 A6-7480
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 draws 15W versus the Radeon R5 A6-7480's 150W — a 163.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 350W (Radeon R5 A6-7480). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon R5 A6-7480
TDP	15W-90%	150W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	45.8+896%	4.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 610 came in at $0, while the Radeon R5 A6-7480 launched at $35. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 610 was 100+% cheaper ($35 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 19.9 (Radeon R5 A6-7480) — the Intel UHD Graphics 610 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 610 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon R5 A6-7480
MSRP	$0-100%	$35
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	19.9
Codename	Comet Lake GT2	Ellesmere
Release	October 1 2017	June 29 2016
Ranking	#824	#305

Search Intel UHD Graphics 610 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 A6-7480 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.