UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon HD 6550A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon HD 6550A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon HD 6550A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel UHD Graphics 610

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6550A

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅Intel UHD Graphics 610 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 6550A is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6550A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (708 vs 687), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6550A is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6550A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon HD 6550A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel UHD Graphics 610

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.

Radeon HD 6550A

The Radeon HD 6550A is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 19 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 708 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 scores 687 and the Radeon HD 6550A reaches 708 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 6550A uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm+++ vs 40 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 480 (Radeon HD 6550A). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550A).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon HD 6550A
G3D Mark Score	687	708+3%
Architecture	Generation 9.5	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm+++	40 nm
Shading Units	184	480+161%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4232 TFLOPS	0.576 TFLOPS+36%
ROPs	3	8+167%
TMUs	23	24+4%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon HD 6550A
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6550A carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 6550A gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Intel UHD Graphics 610 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6550A.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon HD 6550A
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 6550A's 45W — a 100% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550A). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon HD 6550A
TDP	15W-67%	45W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	1x 6-pin
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	45.8+192%	15.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Intel UHD Graphics 610 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 6550A launched at $30. On MSRP, Intel UHD Graphics 610 was 100+% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 23.6 (Radeon HD 6550A) — the Intel UHD Graphics 610 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Intel UHD Graphics 610 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 610	Radeon HD 6550A
MSRP	$0-100%	$30
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	23.6
Codename	Comet Lake GT2	Onega
Release	October 1 2017	April 19 2011
Ranking	#824	#926

Search Intel UHD Graphics 610 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6550A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.