Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Quadro K610M
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Popular choices:
Quadro K610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 610.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Quadro K610M
Intel UHD Graphics 610
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.
Quadro K610M
The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 scores 687 and the Quadro K610M reaches 714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro K610M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 384 (Quadro K610M). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 687 | 714+4% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 384+109% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS | 0.8632 TFLOPS+104% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+2% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 8+167% |
| TMUs | 23+44% | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K610M has 1 GB. The Quadro K610M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 draws 15W versus the Quadro K610M's 30W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 350W (Quadro K610M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-50% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 45.8+92% | 23.8 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | — |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | GM108 |
| Release | October 1 2017 | March 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #824 | #842 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Quadro K610M
