Intel UHD Graphics 610
VS
NVS 510

Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVS 510

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 610

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
VS

NVS 510

2015Core: 902 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 510

#306
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
9783%
#321
NVS 510
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
100%
#322
GRID M60-1Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50
98%
#323
GRID K280Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50
94%
#324
FirePro M2000
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
94%
#325
Tesla K20c
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500
92%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
91%
#327
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
91%
#328
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
91%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
88%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
86%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
85%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
85%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
84%
#335
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
84%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightIntel UHD Graphics 610NVS 510
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 610 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVS 510

Intel

Intel UHD Graphics 610

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.

NVIDIA

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 scores 687 and the NVS 510 reaches 680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is built on Generation 9.5 while the NVS 510 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 512 (NVS 510). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 610NVS 510
G3D Mark Score
687+1%
680
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Maxwell
Process Node
14 nm+++
28 nm
Shading Units
184
512 ×2+178%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4232 TFLOPS
1.058 TFLOPS ×2+150%
Boost Clock
1150 MHz+11%
1033 MHz
ROPs
3
16 ×2+433%
TMUs
23
32 ×2+39%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 610NVS 510
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 510 has 2 GB. The NVS 510 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 610NVS 510
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 610NVS 510
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
3
4+33%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,JPEG,VC-1 (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 610NVS 510
Encoder
Quick Sync Video
1st Gen NVENC
Decoder
Quick Sync Video
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs
H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,JPEG,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 draws 15W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 127.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 65°C.

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 610NVS 510
TDP
15W-78%
68W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Length
160mm
Height
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
65°C-13%
Perf/Watt
45.8+358%
10.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Intel UHD Graphics 610 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the NVS 510 launched at $449 and now averages $15. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 45.3 (NVS 510) — the Intel UHD Graphics 610 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureIntel UHD Graphics 610NVS 510
MSRP
$0-100%
$449
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$15
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
45.3
Codename
Comet Lake GT2
GM107
Release
October 1 2017
November 4 2015
Ranking
#824
#826