
Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs Radeon RX Vega 3

Intel UHD Graphics 610
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega 3 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega 3 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 3.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 610 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and Radeon RX Vega 3

Intel UHD Graphics 610
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 184 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 687 points.

Radeon RX Vega 3
The Radeon RX Vega 3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2019. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1001 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 684 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 scores 687 and the Radeon RX Vega 3 reaches 684 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 610 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon RX Vega 3 uses GCN 5.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 14 nm. Shader units: 184 (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 192 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Raw compute: 0.4232 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 0.3844 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 3). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1001 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 687 | 684 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 184 | 192+4% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4232 TFLOPS+10% | 0.3844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz+15% | 1001 MHz |
| ROPs | 3 | 4+33% |
| TMUs | 23+92% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega 3). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync Video (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX Vega 3). Decoder: Quick Sync Video vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,JPEG,VC-1 (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 3).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync Video | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync Video | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.265/HEVC,H.264,VP9,VP8,JPEG,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 draws 15W versus the Radeon RX Vega 3's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon RX Vega 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega 3). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 45.8 | 45.6 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 610 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon RX Vega 3 launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 610) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega 3) — the Radeon RX Vega 3 offers NaN% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 3 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | Radeon RX Vega 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Comet Lake GT2 | Picasso |
| Release | October 1 2017 | January 6 2019 |
| Ranking | #824 | #845 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















