NVS 510 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 510 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

NVS 510 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 510

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,550 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 571.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $2,999 MSRP).
✅Draws 68W instead of 150W, a 82W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro FX 4700 X2

2008

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
567.9% HIGHER MSRP
$2,999 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($2,999 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌120.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

NVS 510 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (680 vs 676), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

NVS 510 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,550 cheaper on MSRP at $449 vs $2,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 571.9% (1.5 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

NVS 510 vs Quadro FX 4700 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

Quadro FX 4700 X2

The Quadro FX 4700 X2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 676 points. Launch price was $1,799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Quadro FX 4700 X2 reaches 676 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 192 (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4700 X2).

Feature	NVS 510	Quadro FX 4700 X2
G3D Mark Score	680	676
Architecture	Maxwell	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2+167%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2+129%	0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs	16 ×2	24+50%
TMUs	32 ×2	64+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+426%	0.19 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 510	Quadro FX 4700 X2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 carries 4 GB. Quadro FX 4700 X2 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 510 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4700 X2. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 510) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the NVS 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 510	Quadro FX 4700 X2
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+426%	0.19 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Quadro FX 4700 X2's 150W — a 75.2% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Quadro FX 4700 X2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	NVS 510	Quadro FX 4700 X2
TDP	68W-55%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	160mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	10.0+122%	4.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the NVS 510 came in at $449, while the Quadro FX 4700 X2 launched at $2999. On MSRP, NVS 510 was 85% cheaper ($2550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (NVS 510) vs 0.2 (Quadro FX 4700 X2) — the NVS 510 offers 650% better value. The newer card here is NVS 510 (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	NVS 510	Quadro FX 4700 X2
MSRP	$449-85%	$2999
Performance per Dollar	1.5+650%	0.2
Codename	GM107	GT200B
Release	November 4 2015	November 11 2008
Ranking	#826	#884

Search NVS 510 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 4700 X2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.