NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 6630M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 6630M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 6630M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

NVS 510

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 68W instead of 186W, a 118W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6630M

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
❌173.5% higher power demand at 186W vs 68W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6630M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (685 vs 680), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

NVS 510 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

NVS 510 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD 6630M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

NVS 510 vs Radeon HD 6630M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

Radeon HD 6630M

The Radeon HD 6630M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 685 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon HD 6630M reaches 685 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6630M uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 6630M). Raw compute: 1.058 TFLOPS ×2 (NVS 510) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6630M).

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon HD 6630M
G3D Mark Score	680	685
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512 ×2	1280+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.058 TFLOPS ×2	1.92 TFLOPS+81%
ROPs	16 ×2	32+100%
TMUs	32 ×2	80+150%
L1 Cache	256 KB	320 KB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon HD 6630M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The NVS 510 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6630M carries 1 GB. NVS 510 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the NVS 510 and System on the Radeon HD 6630M. L2 Cache: 1 MB (NVS 510) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6630M) — the NVS 510 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon HD 6630M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon HD 6630M's 186W — a 92.9% difference. The NVS 510 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6630M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon HD 6630M
TDP	68W-63%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	160mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	65°C	—
Perf/Watt	10.0+170%	3.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is NVS 510 (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	NVS 510	Radeon HD 6630M
MSRP	$449	—
Codename	GM107	Cayman
Release	November 4 2015	December 1 2011
Ranking	#826	#598

Search NVS 510 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6630M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.