NVS 510 vs Radeon R8 M535DX
NVS 510
Popular choices:
Radeon R8 M535DX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The NVS 510 is positioned at rank 321 and the Radeon R8 M535DX is on rank 498, so the NVS 510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar NVS 510
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R8 M535DX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The NVS 510 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R8 M535DX.
| Insight | NVS 510 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN (2012−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The NVS 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 510 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $150), it costs 90% less, resulting in a 914.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | NVS 510 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+914.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of NVS 510 and Radeon R8 M535DX
NVS 510
The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.
Radeon R8 M535DX
The Radeon R8 M535DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 670 points.
Graphics Performance
The NVS 510 scores 680 and the Radeon R8 M535DX reaches 670 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The NVS 510 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R8 M535DX uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (NVS 510) vs 896 (Radeon R8 M535DX).
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 680+1% | 670 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 ×2 | 896+75% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The NVS 510 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R8 M535DX has 512 MB. The NVS 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The NVS 510 draws 68W versus the Radeon R8 M535DX's 30W — a 77.6% difference. The Radeon R8 M535DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (NVS 510) vs 350W (Radeon R8 M535DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 68W | 30W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 160mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 10.0 | 22.3+123% |
Value Analysis
The NVS 510 launched at $449 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon R8 M535DX launched at $150 and now averages $150. The NVS 510 costs 90% less ($135 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.3 (NVS 510) vs 4.5 (Radeon R8 M535DX) — the NVS 510 offers 906.7% better value. The NVS 510 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | NVS 510 | Radeon R8 M535DX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $449 | $150-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-90% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.3+907% | 4.5 |
| Codename | GM107 | — |
| Release | November 4 2015 | June 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #826 | #800 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on NVS 510 and Radeon R8 M535DX
